The Mini2 762 will accept both 556 and 762 muzzle devices as the external geometry is the same (but the 762 is longer, so not backwards compatible). And, all your guns can have Surefire SOCOM muzzle devices. It has the same footprint as the 556 RC SOCOM, but will also accept 6.5 and 7.62 hosts. We have been selling a lot of 762 Mini2 lately. I won't diverge into other options and confuse you with more choices, although CGS is very intriguing. But Surefire and DeadAir are always in the top 5 of our selections. We sell Surefire and DeadAir, and some other really innovative brands. One you did not mention is the Surefire 762 Mini2. The Nomad can adapt different caps for 556, 6.5 and 762, and is a good choice. The RC2 is going to be heavy and solid and only 5.56. The Nomad is somewhat of a go-to if you cannot decide, and so is the RC2. It ties you into the DA family of muzzle devices, or you can get the Nomad and use an adapter or direct thread. The KeyMo is not a suppressor but an adapter. The OSS is pretty solid, and new technology. Some good choices, and great advice already. KeyMo is extremely appealing because I wouldn't be married to one suppressor and have a lot more options for muzzle devices, IE I could get my favorite muzzle device and then decide which suppressor(s) I like the most. OSS is really appealing for the decent flash reduction, can use it on more than just an AR and low impact parts due to less blowback, I see myself getting the 762 ti can. I like the surefire for the flash suppression, but would likely be a dedicated 556 can only for ARs, but the trainer and blank firing adapter are great for training.
Pros: Can use a 13.7 / 13.9 barrel, widest options for suppressor and muzzle device choicesĬons: Weight (due to keymo adapter), blowback (depends on suppressor) Pros: Little to no blowback, weight (ti model), will work with non-ARs I get down the road (especially if I opt for the 762 ti can), less part wear due to little to no blowbackĬons: Would need to go with a 14.5" barrel, terrible flash from footage I've seen even with the flash hider models Pros: Flash suppression w/ and w/o the can, durability, trainers and blank firing adapter is a big plus, can use a 13.7 / 13.9" barrel One that's a cheapo built and another ultralight.
This is going on a 556, but I do plan on getting 6MM ARC and 300BLK down the road including that I have a 22lr. Those tines must be right up against that blast baffle!ĭoes anyone have a Turbo-K we can measure? If necessary, we can measure the Key-Mo adapter separately.Finally pulled the budget together for the rest of my dream rifle build and am a bit torn on the muzzle device. It's really hard to say how much longer the NOX flash hider is compared to the standard version, but a very rough guess would be an additional 1/4" - 3/8", based on the photos. (Please bear in mind that I'm using a tape measure and not a set of calipers, so my dimensions are not exact.) It looks like we have a 3/16" gap using the muzzle brake, and a 5/16" gap from the flash hider to the blast baffle, or somewhere thereabouts. On a flash hider, it is 2-7/16 long from the base of the mounting lugs. On the older style muzzle brake without the wrench flats on the rear, it is 2-9/16" long from the base of the mounting lugs (not the rear of the muzzle brake). The base of the locking ring sticks out past the mounting lug approximately 1/16" - 1/8", giving us about 2-3/4" clearance from the base of the mounting lug on the muzzle device to the blast baffle. On both my Sandman-K and Sandman-S, it is 2-7/8" from the base of the locking ring to the tip of the blast baffle.
0 kommentar(er)
